Definder - what does the word mean?

What is Friedrich Nietzsche's?

Some crazy guy who died alone that autists and other filthy subhumans love to quote in order to feel edgy and smarter than your average dumb cunt who has had sex.

Maybe you'll get laid if you didn't keep quoting Friedrich Nietzsche

👍67 👎213


Friedrich Nietzsche's - video


Friedrich Nietzsche's - what is it?

Despite popular belief (from many pseudo-intellectuals, who don't understand him) Friedrich Nietzsche WAS, in-fact, an antisemite, and his views are very in-concordance with Nazi and Fascist ideologies, and individualism. Nietzsche was all about self-governance and individualism, and choosing one's fate. (Self-determination.)

In fact, in his book, Anti-Christ, he called the Jews "the strangest race on Earth and human history." And a "life-denying" people. He was very anti-Judeo-Christianity and Abrahamic religion (i.e. Christianity, Islam), believing that these Semitic values, contradicted human nature and made people weak, degenerate and life-denying. He believed that the values of Buddhism and paganism were far more legitimate in empowering people. Nietzsche was all about exercising individual's human nature and prejudices, because not doing so, would cost them power, and would make individuals weak and degenerate. It is fair to say that Nietzsche was in favor of both totalitarianism, as well as Tribalism/Anarchy, (opposite of totalitarianism) but as long as they exercised the individual's will-to-power, and there were no Untermenshen to disrupt the natural power process. (This means that Nietzsche would be, very in-favor of concepts such as racial segregation.)

People (mostly misinformed left-wingers, Marxists, or Utilitarians, or Anarchist teenagers, and other deceitful charlatans) who think that Friedrich Nietzsche wasn't an antisemite are total idiots, and clearly have not read many of his writings. The guy was totally and completely antisemitic.

👍71 👎155


What does "Friedrich Nietzsche's" mean?

An absolute brilliant German philosopher that is often overlooked, overshadowed, underappreciated and/or completely misunderstood. He could deconstruct logical aspects of human concepts that would blow your mind. Even people like Albert Einstein or Rene Descartes would never win; in an argument against Nietzsche. At least, according to Nietzsche's train of thought and his natural strict logic composition; in regards to metaphysics.

Rene Descartes always focuses on "essence" and "truth"; while Nietzsche argues that essence and truth are not real and are only ideas or figments of illusions in our conscious minds. Nietzsche focuses on the subconscious; while Descartes focuses on the conscious mind. "I think, therefore I am."

Nietzsche: You do not "think"!!. You only "believe" that "you think". Your brain is an organ struggling for life, just like your heart, liver, kidneys and everything else!

Descartes: I do not understand what you are saying, Nietzsche!

Nietzsche: You have missed the big picture entirely and focused on the irrelevant, simple matters.

Descartes: I still don't think I hear you!

Nietzsche: Likewise.

Albert Einstein: Doing something over and over again and expecting a different result is the definition of insanity.

Friedrich Nietzsche: No it isn't, Einstein! Doing something over and over again is NOT insanity. The very fact that you use the aspect/essence of "insanity" contradicts the whole concept of: A HAPPENING. A happening is just exactly that: A HAPPENING. An indifferent, recurrent happening. And it will always function in our indifferent universe as: a happening. It is only human judgement and interpretation that: a happening; will be thought of as "insanity". Therefore, doing something over and over again and expecting a different result is NOT insanity. Only human minds can determine what doing something over and over again is. Conclusion: IT IS NEITHER "INSANITY" NOR "SANITY"! IT IS A HAPPENING!

Einstein, Descartes and Everbody else: WOW! MIND = BLOWN

👍69 👎31


Friedrich Nietzsche's - what does it mean?

German philosopher who propounded that all masculine dialectics begin as feminine conflicts.

Friedrich Nietzsche argued that the good vs. evil dialectic was a feminine dialectic which replaced the more masculine true vs. false dialectic.

He was interested in the emergence of Jehovah from the Iranian goddess Ishtar or Zarathustra.

His work followed the work of Karl Marx who argued that capitalism was a left-wing idea that had slowly convinced conservatives that it was right-wing.

👍25 👎11